Home/CVE/A SAML authentication replay vulnerability in Rancher's Assertion
Consumer Service (ACS) handler did not enforce
one-t
CVE
CVE-2026-44946
A SAML authentication replay vulnerability in Rancher's Assertion
Consumer Service (ACS) handler did not enforce
one-t
A SAML authentication replay vulnerability in Rancher's Assertion Consumer Service (ACS) handler did not enforce one-time use of SAML assertion, potentially allowing person in the middle attacks against Rancher, affecting Rancher 2.14.0 before 2.14.3,.
Monitor
- ⚠ NVD has not scored this CVE yet - manual triage required (common for recent CVEs)
No Sigma yet — build one →
YARA rules0
Look this up elsewhere - one-click external pivots
▸
How to read a CVE - triage first, then detect and patch
This page is every public fact about CVE-2026-44946, cross-linked. Its job is to answer one question fast - does this need my attention now? - and then hand you the two things you do about it. Here is how an analyst reads it.
Triage: should I act now? Four signals, and they are not interchangeable:
CVSSseverity - how bad it is IF exploited, 0-10. A high CVSS alone is not urgency; a flaw can be a perfect 10 and never actually be attacked.
EPSSprobability - a model’s estimate of the chance it is exploited in the next 30 days, 0-1. This is the “will it actually happen” signal.
CISA KEVconfirmed - it is being exploited in the wild right now. The strongest signal on the page; KEV beats any score.
Weaponisedavailability - public exploits / PoCs, and especially Metasploit modules rated Excellent / Great. Reliable, packaged exploit code means low-skill attackers can use it today.
How they combine: KEV, or a dependable Metasploit module, means patch now regardless of CVSS. High CVSS + low EPSS + no exploit is real but not an emergency - schedule it. Low CVSS but KEV-listed still gets patched now. The verdict above already weighed these for you; this is how it got there.
Then what - two workflows:
Detectwhen you cannot patch today, follow this CVE to the ATT&CK techniques it enables, then Build a SIEM detection (the green button) - author a rule, test it in Atomic, deploy it. That buys visibility while the patch waits.
PatchAffected products / packages tell you if you are exposed; Fixed versions by distribution and Vendor advisories give the exact version that closes it.
Reading order for the panels below: verdict + badges, then Public exploits / Metasploit (is it weaponised), then ATT&CK techniques + Sigma / IDS rules (can I detect it), then Affected products / packages + Fixed versions (am I exposed, what patches it), then Threat actors / IOCs (who uses it), then Scoring & timeline / references (the evidence).
◆
ATT&CK techniques
12Techniques this CVE enables. Pills with a solid outline are high confidence - named directly in ATT&CK or Nuclei, or human-curated by CTID; the rest are inferred from the weakness type using MITRE's CVE Mapping Methodology and the CWE → CAPEC chain. Broad, generic-weakness guesses are filtered out. A small N× marks a technique that N independent sources agree on.
T1021 · Remote Services T1021.002 · SMB/Windows Admin Shares T1040 · Network Sniffing T1114.002 · Remote Email Collection T1133 · External Remote Services T1134.001 · Token Impersonation/Theft T1550.002 · Pass the Hash T1550.003 · Pass the Ticket T1550.004 · Web Session Cookie T1557 · Adversary-in-the-Middle T1558 · Steal or Forge Kerberos Tickets T1558.003 · Kerberoasting
▤ Build a SIEM detection for these techniques
▤
CAPEC attack patterns
10Attack patterns this CVE enables - the bridge from weakness to ATT&CK technique.
CAPEC-CAPEC-102 · Session Sidejacking CAPEC-CAPEC-509 · Kerberoasting CAPEC-CAPEC-555 · Remote Services with Stolen Credentials CAPEC-CAPEC-561 · Windows Admin Shares with Stolen Credentials CAPEC-CAPEC-60 · Reusing Session IDs (aka Session Replay) CAPEC-CAPEC-644 · Use of Captured Hashes (Pass The Hash) CAPEC-CAPEC-645 · Use of Captured Tickets (Pass The Ticket) CAPEC-CAPEC-652 · Use of Known Kerberos Credentials CAPEC-CAPEC-701 · Browser in the Middle (BiTM) CAPEC-CAPEC-94 · Adversary in the Middle (AiTM)
⬡
Weakness Classification
▤
Related CVEs
4CVEs linked to this one by a shared weakness (CWE) or affected product - joins on data already in the engine, with the reason shown per row.
CVE-2002-0054
SMTP service in (1) Microsoft Windows 2000 and (2) Internet Mail Connector (IMC)...
same CWE-294
CVE-2011-20002
A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU V1 family (incl. SIPL...
same CWE-294
HIGH
CVE-2013-1351
Verax NMS prior to 2.10 allows authentication via the encrypted password without...
same CWE-294
MEDIUM
CVE-2017-6823
Fiyo CMS 2.0.6.1 allows remote authenticated users to gain privileges via a modi...
1
same CWE-294
HIGH
🔗
References & Sources
1Source URLs (vendor pages, mailing lists, write-ups). Exploit/PoC links are in their own section above to avoid duplication.