CVE-2025-27212

Home/CVE/An Improper Input Validation in certain UniFi Access devices could allow a Command Injection by a malicious actor with a

CVE

An Improper Input Validation in certain UniFi Access devices could allow a Command Injection by a malicious actor with a

An Improper Input Validation in certain UniFi Access devices could allow a Command Injection by a malicious actor with access to UniFi Access management network. Affected Products: UniFi Access Reader Pro (Version 2.14.21 and earlier) UniFi Access G2 Reader Pro (Version 1.10.32 and earlier) UniFi Access G3 Reader Pro (Version 1.10.30 and earlier) UniFi Access Intercom (Version 1.7.28 and earlier) UniFi Access G3 Intercom (Version 1.7.29 and earlier) UniFi Access Intercom Viewer (Version 1.3.20 and earlier) Mitigation: Update UniFi Access Reader Pro Version 2.15.9 or later Update UniFi Access G2 Reader Pro Version 1.11.23 or later Update UniFi Access G3 Reader Pro Version 1.11.22 or later Update UniFi Access Intercom Version 1.8.22 or later Update UniFi Access G3 Intercom Version 1.8.22 or later Update UniFi Access Intercom Viewer Version 1.4.39 or later.

CRITICAL · CVSS 9.8 EPSS 0.03794

Schedule remediation

SSVC automatable: yes - attacks can be scripted at scale
CVSS base score ≥ 7.0

Sigma rules0 YARA rules0

Look this up elsewhere - one-click external pivots

NVD CVE.org CISA Vulners Exploit-DB GitHub PoC VulnCheck KEV GreyNoise

▸ How to read a CVE - triage first, then detect and patch

This page is every public fact about CVE-2025-27212, cross-linked. Its job is to answer one question fast - does this need my attention now? - and then hand you the two things you do about it. Here is how an analyst reads it.

Triage: should I act now? Four signals, and they are not interchangeable:

CVSSseverity - how bad it is IF exploited, 0-10. A high CVSS alone is not urgency; a flaw can be a perfect 10 and never actually be attacked. EPSSprobability - a model’s estimate of the chance it is exploited in the next 30 days, 0-1. This is the “will it actually happen” signal. CISA KEVconfirmed - it is being exploited in the wild right now. The strongest signal on the page; KEV beats any score. Weaponisedavailability - public exploits / PoCs, and especially Metasploit modules rated Excellent / Great. Reliable, packaged exploit code means low-skill attackers can use it today.

How they combine: KEV, or a dependable Metasploit module, means patch now regardless of CVSS. High CVSS + low EPSS + no exploit is real but not an emergency - schedule it. Low CVSS but KEV-listed still gets patched now. The verdict above already weighed these for you; this is how it got there.

Then what - two workflows:

Detectwhen you cannot patch today, follow this CVE to the ATT&CK techniques it enables, then Build a SIEM detection (the green button) - author a rule, test it in Atomic, deploy it. That buys visibility while the patch waits. PatchAffected products / packages tell you if you are exposed; Fixed versions by distribution and Vendor advisories give the exact version that closes it.

Reading order for the panels below: verdict + badges, then Public exploits / Metasploit (is it weaponised), then ATT&CK techniques + Sigma / IDS rules (can I detect it), then Affected products / packages + Fixed versions (am I exposed, what patches it), then Threat actors / IOCs (who uses it), then Scoring & timeline / references (the evidence).

View attack path from CVE-2025-27212

◆

ATT&CK techniques

Techniques this CVE enables - linked via CWECAPECATT&CK. High◆ = named directly in ATT&CK or Nuclei templates.

T1027 · Obfuscated Files or Information T1036.001 · Invalid Code Signature T1539 · Steal Web Session Cookie T1553.002 · Code Signing T1562.003 · Impair Command History Logging T1574.006 · Dynamic Linker Hijacking T1574.007 · Path Interception by PATH Environment Variable

▤ Build a SIEM detection for these techniques

▤

CAPEC attack patterns

Attack patterns this CVE enables - the bridge from weakness to ATT&CK technique.

CAPEC-CAPEC-10 · Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables CAPEC-CAPEC-101 · Server Side Include (SSI) Injection CAPEC-CAPEC-104 · Cross Zone Scripting CAPEC-CAPEC-108 · Command Line Execution through SQL Injection CAPEC-CAPEC-109 · Object Relational Mapping Injection CAPEC-CAPEC-110 · SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter Tampering CAPEC-CAPEC-120 · Double Encoding CAPEC-CAPEC-13 · Subverting Environment Variable Values CAPEC-CAPEC-135 · Format String Injection CAPEC-CAPEC-136 · LDAP Injection CAPEC-CAPEC-14 · Client-side Injection-induced Buffer Overflow CAPEC-CAPEC-15 · Command Delimiters

⬡

Weakness Classification

CWE-20Improper Input Validation

CWE-77Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection')

▣

Scoring & Timeline

9.8

CRITICAL · CVSS v3.1 · [email protected]

View on NVD

Attack Vector

Network Adjacent Local Physical

Attack Complexity

Low High

Privileges Required

None Low High

User Interaction

None Required

Scope

Unchanged Changed

Confidentiality

None Low High

Integrity

None Low High

Availability

None Low High

Published to NVD04 Aug 2025 · 11:15 PM

CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

SSVC triage · cisa-vulnrichment

Exploitation

none

Automatable

yes

Technical impact

total

SSVC asks the questions that actually drive patch urgency: is it being exploited, can attacks be automated, and how total is the impact.

🔗

References & Sources

Source URLs (vendor pages, mailing lists, write-ups). Exploit/PoC links are in their own section above to avoid duplication.

https://community.ui.com/releases/Security-Advisory-Bulletin-051-051/583fa6e1-3d85-42ec-a453-651d1653c9b3