Home/CVE/Integer overflow in Trihedral Engineering VTScada (formerly VTS) 6.5 through 9.x before 9.1.20, 10.x before 10.2.22, and
CVE

CVE-2014-9192

Integer overflow in Trihedral Engineering VTScada (formerly VTS) 6.5 through 9.x before 9.1.20, 10.x before 10.2.22, and

Integer overflow in Trihedral Engineering VTScada (formerly VTS) 6.5 through 9.x before 9.1.20, 10.x before 10.2.22, and 11.x before 11.1.07 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (server crash) via a crafted request, which triggers a large memory allocation.

HIGH · CVSS 7.8 EPSS 0.02694
Schedule remediation
  • CVSS base score ≥ 7.0
Sigma rules0 YARA rules0
Look this up elsewhere - one-click external pivots
How to read a CVE - triage first, then detect and patch
This page is every public fact about CVE-2014-9192, cross-linked. Its job is to answer one question fast - does this need my attention now? - and then hand you the two things you do about it. Here is how an analyst reads it.
Triage: should I act now? Four signals, and they are not interchangeable:
CVSSseverity - how bad it is IF exploited, 0-10. A high CVSS alone is not urgency; a flaw can be a perfect 10 and never actually be attacked. EPSSprobability - a model’s estimate of the chance it is exploited in the next 30 days, 0-1. This is the “will it actually happen” signal. CISA KEVconfirmed - it is being exploited in the wild right now. The strongest signal on the page; KEV beats any score. Weaponisedavailability - public exploits / PoCs, and especially Metasploit modules rated Excellent / Great. Reliable, packaged exploit code means low-skill attackers can use it today.
How they combine: KEV, or a dependable Metasploit module, means patch now regardless of CVSS. High CVSS + low EPSS + no exploit is real but not an emergency - schedule it. Low CVSS but KEV-listed still gets patched now. The verdict above already weighed these for you; this is how it got there.
Then what - two workflows:
Detectwhen you cannot patch today, follow this CVE to the ATT&CK techniques it enables, then Build a SIEM detection (the green button) - author a rule, test it in Atomic, deploy it. That buys visibility while the patch waits. PatchAffected products / packages tell you if you are exposed; Fixed versions by distribution and Vendor advisories give the exact version that closes it.
Reading order for the panels below: verdict + badges, then Public exploits / Metasploit (is it weaponised), then ATT&CK techniques + Sigma / IDS rules (can I detect it), then Affected products / packages + Fixed versions (am I exposed, what patches it), then Threat actors / IOCs (who uses it), then Scoring & timeline / references (the evidence).

ATT&CK techniques

1

Techniques this CVE enables - linked via CWECAPECATT&CK. High◆ = named directly in ATT&CK or Nuclei templates.

▤ Build a SIEM detection for these techniques

CAPEC attack patterns

1

Attack patterns this CVE enables - the bridge from weakness to ATT&CK technique.

Weakness Classification

Affected Products & Versions

3
trihedral vtscada>= 6.5 and < 9.1.20
trihedral vtscada>= 10.0 and < 10.2.22
trihedral vtscada>= 11.0 and < 11.1.07

Detection Rules (IDS/IPS)

1
Open rulesets (ET Open, Snort Community, abuse.ch) link to source. Commercial rulesets are reference-only.

Scoring & Timeline

7.8
HIGH · CVSS v2 (legacy) · [email protected]
View on NVD
This CVE predates CVSS v3; the legacy v2 score is shown so triage still has a severity to work with.
v2 Vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Published to NVD11 Dec 2014 · 03:59 PM

Vendor Advisories

1
cisa-csafcisa-csaf-csaf_files-OT-white-2014-icsa-14-343-02
🔗

References & Sources

4
Source URLs (vendor pages, mailing lists, write-ups). Exploit/PoC links are in their own section above to avoid duplication.
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/71591Third Party AdvisoryVDB Entry
https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov//advisories/ICSA-14-343-02Third Party AdvisoryUS Government Resource
threatengine.sh