Home/CVE/mise manages dev tools like node, python, cmake, and terraform. Prior to 2026.6.4, mise's trust feature gates config fil
CVE
CVE-2026-55441
mise manages dev tools like node, python, cmake, and terraform. Prior to 2026.6.4, mise's trust feature gates config fil
mise manages dev tools like node, python, cmake, and terraform. Prior to 2026.6.4, mise's trust feature gates config files (mise.toml, .tool-versions) through trust_check, but task-include files are loaded on a path that never reaches it. When a directory has a task-include dir (mise-tasks/, .mise/tasks/, …) but no config file, mise falls back to the default includes and renders each task's tera fields, and that tera environment has exec() registered.
A {{ exec(command='…') }} in any rendered field runs arbitrary commands the moment the tasks are merely listed. There's no config file to gate on, so no trust prompt ever appears. Read-only commands trigger it: mise tasks, mise task ls, mise run, mise tasks --usage (the query shell completion runs on Tab).
The victim only has to cd into a cloned repo and list or tab-complete a task. This vulnerability is fixed in 2026.6.4.
HIGH · CVSS 8.6
Schedule remediation
- CVSS base score ≥ 7.0
No Sigma yet — build one →
YARA rules0
Look this up elsewhere - one-click external pivots
▸
How to read a CVE - triage first, then detect and patch
This page is every public fact about CVE-2026-55441, cross-linked. Its job is to answer one question fast - does this need my attention now? - and then hand you the two things you do about it. Here is how an analyst reads it.
Triage: should I act now? Four signals, and they are not interchangeable:
CVSSseverity - how bad it is IF exploited, 0-10. A high CVSS alone is not urgency; a flaw can be a perfect 10 and never actually be attacked.
EPSSprobability - a model’s estimate of the chance it is exploited in the next 30 days, 0-1. This is the “will it actually happen” signal.
CISA KEVconfirmed - it is being exploited in the wild right now. The strongest signal on the page; KEV beats any score.
Weaponisedavailability - public exploits / PoCs, and especially Metasploit modules rated Excellent / Great. Reliable, packaged exploit code means low-skill attackers can use it today.
How they combine: KEV, or a dependable Metasploit module, means patch now regardless of CVSS. High CVSS + low EPSS + no exploit is real but not an emergency - schedule it. Low CVSS but KEV-listed still gets patched now. The verdict above already weighed these for you; this is how it got there.
Then what - two workflows:
Detectwhen you cannot patch today, follow this CVE to the ATT&CK techniques it enables, then Build a SIEM detection (the green button) - author a rule, test it in Atomic, deploy it. That buys visibility while the patch waits.
PatchAffected products / packages tell you if you are exposed; Fixed versions by distribution and Vendor advisories give the exact version that closes it.
Reading order for the panels below: verdict + badges, then Public exploits / Metasploit (is it weaponised), then ATT&CK techniques + Sigma / IDS rules (can I detect it), then Affected products / packages + Fixed versions (am I exposed, what patches it), then Threat actors / IOCs (who uses it), then Scoring & timeline / references (the evidence).
EPSS exploitation probability
n/a
No EPSS score in our data for this CVE. EPSS is published daily for scored CVEs - a very new, reserved, or rejected CVE may not have one yet.
CVSS metric silhouette
shape grows toward worst-case
SSVC triage · cisa-vulnrichment
Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Tech impact
total
CVSS vector breakdown
Exploitability - how they get in
Attack Vector
Network
Adjacent
Local
Physical
Attack Complexity
Low
High
Privileges Required
None
Low
High
User Interaction
None
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Changed
Impact - what breaks
Confidentiality
None
Low
High
Integrity
None
Low
High
Availability
None
Low
High
VECTOR
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H◆
ATT&CK techniques
4Techniques this CVE enables. Pills with a solid outline are high confidence - named directly in ATT&CK or Nuclei, or human-curated by CTID; the rest are inferred from the weakness type using MITRE's CVE Mapping Methodology and the CWE → CAPEC chain. Broad, generic-weakness guesses are filtered out. A small N× marks a technique that N independent sources agree on.
T1027.006 · HTML Smuggling T1027.009 · Embedded Payloads T1059 · Command and Scripting Interpreter T1564.009 · Resource Forking
▤ Build a SIEM detection for these techniques
▤
CAPEC attack patterns
12Attack patterns this CVE enables - the bridge from weakness to ATT&CK technique.
CAPEC-CAPEC-1 · Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs CAPEC-CAPEC-108 · Command Line Execution through SQL Injection CAPEC-CAPEC-122 · Privilege Abuse CAPEC-CAPEC-127 · Directory Indexing CAPEC-CAPEC-15 · Command Delimiters CAPEC-CAPEC-17 · Using Malicious Files CAPEC-CAPEC-180 · Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels CAPEC-CAPEC-206 · Signing Malicious Code CAPEC-CAPEC-234 · Hijacking a privileged process CAPEC-CAPEC-242 · Code Injection CAPEC-CAPEC-35 · Leverage Executable Code in Non-Executable Files CAPEC-CAPEC-43 · Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers
⬡
Weakness Classification
▤
Affected Packages
1Language-ecosystem packages (from OSV) tied to this CVE, with the version that fixes it - the dependency-level detail NVD doesn’t carry.
crates.io
mise
HIGH
fixed in 2026.6.4
▤
Related CVEs
8CVEs linked to this one by a shared weakness (CWE) or affected product - joins on data already in the engine, with the reason shown per row.
CVE-2001-0006
The Winsock2ProtocolCatalogMutex mutex in Windows NT 4.0 has inappropriate Every...
1
same CWE-732
HIGH
CVE-2004-1714
BlackICE PC Protection and Server Protection installs (1) firewall.ini, (2) blac...
1
same CWE-732
HIGH
CVE-2005-4868
Shared memory sections and events in IBM DB2 8.1 have default permissions of rea...
1
same CWE-732
HIGH
CVE-2007-5544
IBM Lotus Notes before 6.5.6, and 7.x before 7.0.3; and Domino before 6.5.5 FP3,...
same CWE-732
HIGH
CVE-1999-0067
phf CGI program allows remote command execution through shell metacharacters.
same CWE-78
CVE-1999-0043
Command execution via shell metachars in INN daemon (innd) 1.5 using "newgroup" ...
same CWE-78
CRITICAL
CVE-2001-1583
lpd daemon (in.lpd) in Solaris 8 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute ...
4
same CWE-78
CVE-2002-0061
Apache for Win32 before 1.3.24, and 2.0.x before 2.0.34-beta, allows remote atta...
1
same CWE-78
🔗
References & Sources
1Source URLs (vendor pages, mailing lists, write-ups). Exploit/PoC links are in their own section above to avoid duplication.