Home/CVE/Shopper is a Headless e-commerce Admin Panel. Prior to 2.8.0, three related defects on admin Livewire components allowed
CVE

CVE-2026-47743

Shopper is a Headless e-commerce Admin Panel. Prior to 2.8.0, three related defects on admin Livewire components allowed

Shopper is a Headless e-commerce Admin Panel. Prior to 2.8.0, three related defects on admin Livewire components allowed data tampering, sensitive data disclosure, and stored XSS. First, several Livewire components in the admin panel exposed Eloquent model identifiers as public properties without the #[Locked] attribute. An authenticated user could rewrite the wire payload from the browser to target any record id, bypassing the implicit scoping enforced by the page routing. Second, Customers/Create::store() re-passed a Hidden _password form field straight into the create payload. The plaintext password was rendered into the HTML and transported through the Livewire snapshot in clear text, exposing credentials in the page DOM and in any logging that captures Livewire payloads. Finally, the product barcode field was rendered through DNS1DFacade::getBarcodeHTML() with {!! !!}. An attacker with edit_products permission could persist malicious payload in the barcode field that would execute in the browser of any admin user viewing that product, enabling session theft and privileged-action chaining. Starting in v2.8.0, all vulnerable Livewire model identifiers are now marked #[Locked].

Customers/Create no longer round-trips the password through a Hidden form field.

the plaintext password is hashed at action boundary and never returned to the client.

and the product barcode rendering now escapes the value before passing it to the barcode generator and the output is wrapped in an <svg> context that does not interpret event handlers. No known workarounds are available.

HIGH · CVSS 8.7 EPSS 0.00353
EPSS exploitation odds0.35% · top 72%
Schedule remediation
  • CVSS base score ≥ 7.0
Look this up elsewhere - one-click external pivots
How to read a CVE - triage first, then detect and patch
This page is every public fact about CVE-2026-47743, cross-linked. Its job is to answer one question fast - does this need my attention now? - and then hand you the two things you do about it. Here is how an analyst reads it.
Triage: should I act now? Four signals, and they are not interchangeable:
CVSSseverity - how bad it is IF exploited, 0-10. A high CVSS alone is not urgency; a flaw can be a perfect 10 and never actually be attacked. EPSSprobability - a model’s estimate of the chance it is exploited in the next 30 days, 0-1. This is the “will it actually happen” signal. CISA KEVconfirmed - it is being exploited in the wild right now. The strongest signal on the page; KEV beats any score. Weaponisedavailability - public exploits / PoCs, and especially Metasploit modules rated Excellent / Great. Reliable, packaged exploit code means low-skill attackers can use it today.
How they combine: KEV, or a dependable Metasploit module, means patch now regardless of CVSS. High CVSS + low EPSS + no exploit is real but not an emergency - schedule it. Low CVSS but KEV-listed still gets patched now. The verdict above already weighed these for you; this is how it got there.
Then what - two workflows:
Detectwhen you cannot patch today, follow this CVE to the ATT&CK techniques it enables, then Build a SIEM detection (the green button) - author a rule, test it in Atomic, deploy it. That buys visibility while the patch waits. PatchAffected products / packages tell you if you are exposed; Fixed versions by distribution and Vendor advisories give the exact version that closes it.
Reading order for the panels below: verdict + badges, then Public exploits / Metasploit (is it weaponised), then ATT&CK techniques + Sigma / IDS rules (can I detect it), then Affected products / packages + Fixed versions (am I exposed, what patches it), then Threat actors / IOCs (who uses it), then Scoring & timeline / references (the evidence).

Exploitation momentum

2 days of EPSS
stable
Exploitation pressure is steady. This reads the direction and speed of EPSS over time, which can move before EPSS itself peaks or before CISA lists it.
Window

Severity & exploitation scoring

View on NVD →
CVSS base score
8.7
HIGHCVSS v3.1 · [email protected]
EPSS exploitation probability
0.35%
Top 72%odds of exploitation in the next 30 days
CVSS metric silhouette
VectorComplexityPrivilegesInteractionScopeConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
shape grows toward worst-case
SSVC triage · cisa-vulnrichment
Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Tech impact
total
CVSS vector breakdown
Exploitability - how they get in
Attack Vector
Network Adjacent Local Physical
Attack Complexity
Low High
Privileges Required
None Low High
User Interaction
None Required
Scope
Unchanged Changed
Impact - what breaks
Confidentiality
None Low High
Integrity
None Low High
Availability
None Low High
VECTORCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N

ATT&CK techniques

1

Techniques this CVE enables. Pills with a solid outline are high confidence - named directly in ATT&CK or Nuclei, or human-curated by CTID; the rest are inferred from the weakness type using MITRE's CVE Mapping Methodology and the CWE → CAPEC chain. Broad, generic-weakness guesses are filtered out. A small marks a technique that N independent sources agree on.

▤ Build a SIEM detection for these techniques

Affected Packages

1
Language-ecosystem packages (from OSV) tied to this CVE, with the version that fixes it - the dependency-level detail NVD doesn’t carry.
Packagist shopper/framework HIGH fixed in 2.8.0
🔗

References & Sources

2
Source URLs (vendor pages, mailing lists, write-ups). Exploit/PoC links are in their own section above to avoid duplication.