CVE-2026-45297

Home/CVE/OpenReplay is a self-hosted session replay suite. Prior to 1.26.0, there is a cross-tenant IDOR on feature-flag and assi

CVE

OpenReplay is a self-hosted session replay suite. Prior to 1.26.0, there is a cross-tenant IDOR on feature-flag and assi

OpenReplay is a self-hosted session replay suite. Prior to 1.26.0, there is a cross-tenant IDOR on feature-flag and assist-stats routes via {project_id} case mismatch. ProjectAuthorizer.__call__ (OSS api/auth/auth_project.py:14-38 and EE ee/api/auth/auth_project.py:14-46) only runs projects.is_authorized(project_id, tenant_id, user_id) + projects.get_project(tenant_id, project_id) when self.project_identifier == "projectId" (camelCase).

For EE multi-tenant, feature-flag queries only filter on project_id, never tenant_id. Any authenticated user in tenant A can read/update/delete feature-flag rows belonging to tenant B by iterating the sequential integer project_id + feature_flag_id. OSS is single-tenant by design ({"errors":["tenants already registered"]} on second signup) so there's no cross-tenant impact This vulnerability is fixed in 1.26.0.

EPSS 0.00043

Schedule remediation

SSVC automatable: yes - attacks can be scripted at scale
⚠ NVD has not scored this CVE yet - manual triage required (common for recent CVEs)

Sigma rules0 YARA rules0

Look this up elsewhere - one-click external pivots

NVD CVE.org CISA Vulners Exploit-DB GitHub PoC VulnCheck KEV GreyNoise

▸ How to read a CVE - triage first, then detect and patch

This page is every public fact about CVE-2026-45297, cross-linked. Its job is to answer one question fast - does this need my attention now? - and then hand you the two things you do about it. Here is how an analyst reads it.

Triage: should I act now? Four signals, and they are not interchangeable:

CVSSseverity - how bad it is IF exploited, 0-10. A high CVSS alone is not urgency; a flaw can be a perfect 10 and never actually be attacked. EPSSprobability - a model’s estimate of the chance it is exploited in the next 30 days, 0-1. This is the “will it actually happen” signal. CISA KEVconfirmed - it is being exploited in the wild right now. The strongest signal on the page; KEV beats any score. Weaponisedavailability - public exploits / PoCs, and especially Metasploit modules rated Excellent / Great. Reliable, packaged exploit code means low-skill attackers can use it today.

How they combine: KEV, or a dependable Metasploit module, means patch now regardless of CVSS. High CVSS + low EPSS + no exploit is real but not an emergency - schedule it. Low CVSS but KEV-listed still gets patched now. The verdict above already weighed these for you; this is how it got there.

Then what - two workflows:

Detectwhen you cannot patch today, follow this CVE to the ATT&CK techniques it enables, then Build a SIEM detection (the green button) - author a rule, test it in Atomic, deploy it. That buys visibility while the patch waits. PatchAffected products / packages tell you if you are exposed; Fixed versions by distribution and Vendor advisories give the exact version that closes it.

Reading order for the panels below: verdict + badges, then Public exploits / Metasploit (is it weaponised), then ATT&CK techniques + Sigma / IDS rules (can I detect it), then Affected products / packages + Fixed versions (am I exposed, what patches it), then Threat actors / IOCs (who uses it), then Scoring & timeline / references (the evidence).

View attack path from CVE-2026-45297

◆

ATT&CK techniques

Techniques this CVE enables - linked via CWECAPECATT&CK. High◆ = named directly in ATT&CK or Nuclei templates.

T1005 · Data from Local System T1012 · Query Registry T1083 · File and Directory Discovery T1134.001 · Token Impersonation/Theft T1550.004 · Web Session Cookie T1552.002 · Credentials in Registry T1562.003 · Impair Command History Logging T1565.002 · Transmitted Data Manipulation T1574.005 · Executable Installer File Permissions Weakness T1574.006 · Dynamic Linker Hijacking T1574.007 · Path Interception by PATH Environment Variable T1574.010 · Services File Permissions Weakness

▤ Build a SIEM detection for these techniques

▤

CAPEC attack patterns

Attack patterns this CVE enables - the bridge from weakness to ATT&CK technique.

CAPEC-CAPEC-1 · Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs CAPEC-CAPEC-104 · Cross Zone Scripting CAPEC-CAPEC-127 · Directory Indexing CAPEC-CAPEC-13 · Subverting Environment Variable Values CAPEC-CAPEC-17 · Using Malicious Files CAPEC-CAPEC-39 · Manipulating Opaque Client-based Data Tokens CAPEC-CAPEC-402 · Bypassing ATA Password Security CAPEC-CAPEC-45 · Buffer Overflow via Symbolic Links CAPEC-CAPEC-5 · Blue Boxing CAPEC-CAPEC-51 · Poison Web Service Registry CAPEC-CAPEC-59 · Session Credential Falsification through Prediction CAPEC-CAPEC-60 · Reusing Session IDs (aka Session Replay)

⬡

Weakness Classification

CWE-285Improper Authorization
CWE-639Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
CWE-863Incorrect Authorization

▣

Scoring & Timeline

Published to NVD28 May 2026 · 06:16 PM

SSVC triage · cisa-vulnrichment

Exploitation

none

Automatable

yes

Technical impact

partial

SSVC asks the questions that actually drive patch urgency: is it being exploited, can attacks be automated, and how total is the impact.

🔗

References & Sources

Source URLs (vendor pages, mailing lists, write-ups). Exploit/PoC links are in their own section above to avoid duplication.

https://github.com/openreplay/openreplay/security/advisories/GHSA-5m23-rcj4-cgjx