Home/CVE/OpenProject is open-source, web-based project management software. Prior to 17.4.0, the GET /api/v3/relations endpoint a
CVE
CVE-2026-44736
OpenProject is open-source, web-based project management software. Prior to 17.4.0, the GET /api/v3/relations endpoint a
OpenProject is open-source, web-based project management software. Prior to 17.4.0, the GET /api/v3/relations endpoint allows any authenticated user to retrieve relations, and the subject (title) of work packages they have no permission to view, by supplying an arbitrary work package ID in the involved, fromId, or toId filter. This bypasses the Relation.visible scope due to a flawed performance optimization in RelationQuery.
This vulnerability is fixed in 17.4.0.
MEDIUM · CVSS 6.5
Monitor
- No active-exploitation, high-EPSS, or public-exploit signals - routine patching cadence
No Sigma yet — build one →
YARA rules0
Look this up elsewhere - one-click external pivots
▸
How to read a CVE - triage first, then detect and patch
This page is every public fact about CVE-2026-44736, cross-linked. Its job is to answer one question fast - does this need my attention now? - and then hand you the two things you do about it. Here is how an analyst reads it.
Triage: should I act now? Four signals, and they are not interchangeable:
CVSSseverity - how bad it is IF exploited, 0-10. A high CVSS alone is not urgency; a flaw can be a perfect 10 and never actually be attacked.
EPSSprobability - a model’s estimate of the chance it is exploited in the next 30 days, 0-1. This is the “will it actually happen” signal.
CISA KEVconfirmed - it is being exploited in the wild right now. The strongest signal on the page; KEV beats any score.
Weaponisedavailability - public exploits / PoCs, and especially Metasploit modules rated Excellent / Great. Reliable, packaged exploit code means low-skill attackers can use it today.
How they combine: KEV, or a dependable Metasploit module, means patch now regardless of CVSS. High CVSS + low EPSS + no exploit is real but not an emergency - schedule it. Low CVSS but KEV-listed still gets patched now. The verdict above already weighed these for you; this is how it got there.
Then what - two workflows:
Detectwhen you cannot patch today, follow this CVE to the ATT&CK techniques it enables, then Build a SIEM detection (the green button) - author a rule, test it in Atomic, deploy it. That buys visibility while the patch waits.
PatchAffected products / packages tell you if you are exposed; Fixed versions by distribution and Vendor advisories give the exact version that closes it.
Reading order for the panels below: verdict + badges, then Public exploits / Metasploit (is it weaponised), then ATT&CK techniques + Sigma / IDS rules (can I detect it), then Affected products / packages + Fixed versions (am I exposed, what patches it), then Threat actors / IOCs (who uses it), then Scoring & timeline / references (the evidence).
⚠
Exploitation evidence
1 of 7 sources
Corroboration score 8/100 ·
emerging.
This counts how many independent sources have exploitation evidence, and separates two different things:
confirmed in-the-wild use (CISA KEV, Microsoft MSRC, ransomware activity) from
exploit / PoC availability (Metasploit, ExploitDB, Nuclei, public PoCs). A template or PoC existing means
an attack is possible and easy - it is not, on its own, proof the CVE is being exploited in the wild.
Exploit / PoC available
public PoC
EPSS exploitation probability
n/a
No EPSS score in our data for this CVE. EPSS is published daily for scored CVEs - a very new, reserved, or rejected CVE may not have one yet.
CVSS metric silhouette
shape grows toward worst-case
SSVC triage · cisa-vulnrichment
Exploitation
poc
Automatable
no
Tech impact
partial
CVSS vector breakdown
Exploitability - how they get in
Attack Vector
Network
Adjacent
Local
Physical
Attack Complexity
Low
High
Privileges Required
None
Low
High
User Interaction
None
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Changed
Impact - what breaks
Confidentiality
None
Low
High
Integrity
None
Low
High
Availability
None
Low
High
VECTOR
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N◆
ATT&CK techniques
2Techniques this CVE enables. Pills with a solid outline are high confidence - named directly in ATT&CK or Nuclei, or human-curated by CTID; the rest are inferred from the weakness type using MITRE's CVE Mapping Methodology and the CWE → CAPEC chain. Broad, generic-weakness guesses are filtered out. A small N× marks a technique that N independent sources agree on.
▤ Build a SIEM detection for these techniques▤
CAPEC attack patterns
12Attack patterns this CVE enables - the bridge from weakness to ATT&CK technique.
CAPEC-CAPEC-116 · Excavation CAPEC-CAPEC-13 · Subverting Environment Variable Values CAPEC-CAPEC-169 · Footprinting CAPEC-CAPEC-22 · Exploiting Trust in Client CAPEC-CAPEC-224 · Fingerprinting CAPEC-CAPEC-285 · ICMP Echo Request Ping CAPEC-CAPEC-287 · TCP SYN Scan CAPEC-CAPEC-290 · Enumerate Mail Exchange (MX) Records CAPEC-CAPEC-291 · DNS Zone Transfers CAPEC-CAPEC-292 · Host Discovery CAPEC-CAPEC-293 · Traceroute Route Enumeration CAPEC-CAPEC-294 · ICMP Address Mask Request
⬡
Weakness Classification
▤
Related CVEs
8CVEs linked to this one by a shared weakness (CWE) or affected product - joins on data already in the engine, with the reason shown per row.
CVE-1999-0059
IRIX fam service allows an attacker to obtain a list of all files on the server.
same CWE-200
HIGH
CVE-1999-0524
ICMP information such as (1) netmask and (2) timestamp is allowed from arbitrary...
same CWE-200
MEDIUM
CVE-1999-1136
Vulnerability in Predictive on HP-UX 11.0 and earlier, and MPE/iX 5.5 and earlie...
same CWE-200
CVE-1999-0453
An attacker can identify a CISCO device by sending a SYN packet to port 1999, wh...
same CWE-200
CVE-2012-5571
A flaw was found in OpenStack Keystone. This vulnerability allows remote authent...
same CWE-639
MEDIUM
CVE-2014-8356
The web administrative portal in Zhone zNID 2426A before S3.0.501 allows remote ...
1
same CWE-639
HIGH
CVE-2016-20033
Wowza Streaming Engine 4.5.0 contains a local privilege escalation vulnerability...
same CWE-639
HIGH
CVE-2017-0882
Multiple versions of GitLab expose sensitive user credentials when assigning a u...
same CWE-639
MEDIUM
🔗
References & Sources
1Source URLs (vendor pages, mailing lists, write-ups). Exploit/PoC links are in their own section above to avoid duplication.