Home/CVE/Fabric.js is a Javascript HTML5 canvas library. Prior to 7.4.0, a potential Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exi
CVE
CVE-2026-44311
Fabric.js is a Javascript HTML5 canvas library. Prior to 7.4.0, a potential Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exi
Fabric.js is a Javascript HTML5 canvas library. Prior to 7.4.0, a potential Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in Fabric.js due to improper escaping of user-controlled input during SVG serialization via the toSVG() method. Specifically, the color field within the colorStops array of a fabric.Gradient object is not properly escaped when converted into SVG <stop> elements.
If an application renders the generated SVG string into the DOM, this may allow an attacker to inject arbitrary HTML/SVG and execute JavaScript in the victim's browser. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.4.0.
MEDIUM · CVSS 5.4
Monitor
- No active-exploitation, high-EPSS, or public-exploit signals - routine patching cadence
No Sigma yet — build one →
YARA rules0
Look this up elsewhere - one-click external pivots
▸
How to read a CVE - triage first, then detect and patch
This page is every public fact about CVE-2026-44311, cross-linked. Its job is to answer one question fast - does this need my attention now? - and then hand you the two things you do about it. Here is how an analyst reads it.
Triage: should I act now? Four signals, and they are not interchangeable:
CVSSseverity - how bad it is IF exploited, 0-10. A high CVSS alone is not urgency; a flaw can be a perfect 10 and never actually be attacked.
EPSSprobability - a model’s estimate of the chance it is exploited in the next 30 days, 0-1. This is the “will it actually happen” signal.
CISA KEVconfirmed - it is being exploited in the wild right now. The strongest signal on the page; KEV beats any score.
Weaponisedavailability - public exploits / PoCs, and especially Metasploit modules rated Excellent / Great. Reliable, packaged exploit code means low-skill attackers can use it today.
How they combine: KEV, or a dependable Metasploit module, means patch now regardless of CVSS. High CVSS + low EPSS + no exploit is real but not an emergency - schedule it. Low CVSS but KEV-listed still gets patched now. The verdict above already weighed these for you; this is how it got there.
Then what - two workflows:
Detectwhen you cannot patch today, follow this CVE to the ATT&CK techniques it enables, then Build a SIEM detection (the green button) - author a rule, test it in Atomic, deploy it. That buys visibility while the patch waits.
PatchAffected products / packages tell you if you are exposed; Fixed versions by distribution and Vendor advisories give the exact version that closes it.
Reading order for the panels below: verdict + badges, then Public exploits / Metasploit (is it weaponised), then ATT&CK techniques + Sigma / IDS rules (can I detect it), then Affected products / packages + Fixed versions (am I exposed, what patches it), then Threat actors / IOCs (who uses it), then Scoring & timeline / references (the evidence).
EPSS exploitation probability
n/a
No EPSS score in our data for this CVE. EPSS is published daily for scored CVEs - a very new, reserved, or rejected CVE may not have one yet.
CVSS metric silhouette
shape grows toward worst-case
SSVC triage
No SSVC vulnrichment for this CVE. CISA's Vulnrichment program scores newer CVEs (~2024 onwards) plus selected older critical ones. Use the EPSS probability + KEV status to triage instead.
CVSS vector breakdown
Exploitability - how they get in
Attack Vector
Network
Adjacent
Local
Physical
Attack Complexity
Low
High
Privileges Required
None
Low
High
User Interaction
None
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Changed
Impact - what breaks
Confidentiality
None
Low
High
Integrity
None
Low
High
Availability
None
Low
High
VECTOR
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N◆
ATT&CK techniques
1Techniques this CVE enables. Pills with a solid outline are high confidence - named directly in ATT&CK or Nuclei, or human-curated by CTID; the rest are inferred from the weakness type using MITRE's CVE Mapping Methodology and the CWE → CAPEC chain. Broad, generic-weakness guesses are filtered out. A small N× marks a technique that N independent sources agree on.
▤ Build a SIEM detection for these techniques▤
CAPEC attack patterns
9Attack patterns this CVE enables - the bridge from weakness to ATT&CK technique.
CAPEC-CAPEC-104 · Cross Zone Scripting CAPEC-CAPEC-209 · XSS Using MIME Type Mismatch CAPEC-CAPEC-588 · DOM-Based XSS CAPEC-CAPEC-591 · Reflected XSS CAPEC-CAPEC-592 · Stored XSS CAPEC-CAPEC-63 · Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) CAPEC-CAPEC-73 · User-Controlled Filename CAPEC-CAPEC-81 · Web Server Logs Tampering CAPEC-CAPEC-85 · AJAX Footprinting
⬡
Weakness Classification
▤
Affected Packages
1Language-ecosystem packages (from OSV) tied to this CVE, with the version that fixes it - the dependency-level detail NVD doesn’t carry.
npm
fabric
MODERATE
fixed in 7.4.0
▤
Related CVEs
8CVEs linked to this one by a shared weakness (CWE) or affected product - joins on data already in the engine, with the reason shown per row. Not a guess.
CVE-2009-4267
The console in Apache jUDDI 3.0.0 does not properly escape line feeds, which all...
same CWE-116
MEDIUM
CVE-2013-4547
nginx 0.8.41 through 1.4.3 and 1.5.x before 1.5.7 allows remote attackers to byp...
1
same CWE-116
CVE-2013-2011
WordPress W3 Super Cache Plugin before 1.3.2 contains a PHP code-execution vulne...
same CWE-116
HIGH
CVE-2014-9938
contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh in Git before 1.9.3 does not sanitize branch na...
same CWE-116
HIGH
CVE-2000-1205
Cross site scripting vulnerabilities in Apache 1.3.0 through 1.3.11 allow remote...
same CWE-79
CVE-2002-0270
Opera, when configured with the "Determine action by MIME type" option disabled,...
same CWE-79
CVE-2002-1651
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Verity Search97 allows remote attack...
same CWE-79
CVE-2002-1700
Cross-site scripting vulnerability (XSS) in the missing template handler in Macr...
1
same CWE-79
🔗
References & Sources
2Source URLs (vendor pages, mailing lists, write-ups). Exploit/PoC links are in their own section above to avoid duplication.