Home/CVE/Lack of authentication when using the "snapshot diff" functions in qSnapper before version 1.3.3 allowed a local attacke
CVE
CVE-2026-41047
Lack of authentication when using the "snapshot diff" functions in qSnapper before version 1.3.3 allowed a local attacke
Lack of authentication when using the "snapshot diff" functions in qSnapper before version 1.3.3 allowed a local attacker to see otherwise read protected information.
Monitor
- ⚠ NVD has not scored this CVE yet - manual triage required (common for recent CVEs)
Sigma rules0
YARA rules0
Look this up elsewhere - one-click external pivots
▸
How to read a CVE - triage first, then detect and patch
This page is every public fact about CVE-2026-41047, cross-linked. Its job is to answer one question fast - does this need my attention now? - and then hand you the two things you do about it. Here is how an analyst reads it.
Triage: should I act now? Four signals, and they are not interchangeable:
CVSSseverity - how bad it is IF exploited, 0-10. A high CVSS alone is not urgency; a flaw can be a perfect 10 and never actually be attacked.
EPSSprobability - a model’s estimate of the chance it is exploited in the next 30 days, 0-1. This is the “will it actually happen” signal.
CISA KEVconfirmed - it is being exploited in the wild right now. The strongest signal on the page; KEV beats any score.
Weaponisedavailability - public exploits / PoCs, and especially Metasploit modules rated Excellent / Great. Reliable, packaged exploit code means low-skill attackers can use it today.
How they combine: KEV, or a dependable Metasploit module, means patch now regardless of CVSS. High CVSS + low EPSS + no exploit is real but not an emergency - schedule it. Low CVSS but KEV-listed still gets patched now. The verdict above already weighed these for you; this is how it got there.
Then what - two workflows:
Detectwhen you cannot patch today, follow this CVE to the ATT&CK techniques it enables, then Build a SIEM detection (the green button) - author a rule, test it in Atomic, deploy it. That buys visibility while the patch waits.
PatchAffected products / packages tell you if you are exposed; Fixed versions by distribution and Vendor advisories give the exact version that closes it.
Reading order for the panels below: verdict + badges, then Public exploits / Metasploit (is it weaponised), then ATT&CK techniques + Sigma / IDS rules (can I detect it), then Affected products / packages + Fixed versions (am I exposed, what patches it), then Threat actors / IOCs (who uses it), then Scoring & timeline / references (the evidence).
▣
Severity & exploitation scoring
EPSS exploitation probability
n/a
No EPSS score in our data for this CVE. EPSS is published daily for scored CVEs - a very new, reserved, or rejected CVE may not have one yet.
CVSS metric silhouette
No structured CVSS vector for this CVE. Older entries often have only a numeric base score - the metric breakdown radar requires a full
AV:_/AC:_/... vector string published by NVD.SSVC triage · cisa-vulnrichment
Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Tech impact
partial
▤
CAPEC attack patterns
5Attack patterns this CVE enables - the bridge from weakness to ATT&CK technique.
⬡
Weakness Classification
▤
Related CVEs
4CVEs linked to this one by a shared weakness (CWE) or affected product - joins on data already in the engine, with the reason shown per row. Not a guess.
CVE-2002-1810
D-Link DWL-900AP+ Access Point 2.1 and 2.2 allows remote attackers to access the...
same CWE-306
HIGH
CVE-2004-0213
Utility Manager in Windows 2000 launches winhlp32.exe while Utility Manager is r...
4
same CWE-306
HIGH
CVE-2006-0061
xlockmore 5.13 and 5.22 segfaults when using libpam-opensc and returns the under...
same CWE-306
CRITICAL
CVE-2006-0062
xlockmore 5.13 allows potential xlock bypass when FVWM switches to the same virt...
same CWE-306
CRITICAL
🔗
References & Sources
3Source URLs (vendor pages, mailing lists, write-ups). Exploit/PoC links are in their own section above to avoid duplication.