Home/CVE/gRPC-Go is the Go language implementation of gRPC. Versions prior to 1.79.3 have an authorization bypass resulting from
CVE

CVE-2026-33186

gRPC-Go is the Go language implementation of gRPC. Versions prior to 1.79.3 have an authorization bypass resulting from

gRPC-Go is the Go language implementation of gRPC. Versions prior to 1.79.3 have an authorization bypass resulting from improper input validation of the HTTP/2 :path pseudo-header. The gRPC-Go server was too lenient in its routing logic, accepting requests where the :path omitted the mandatory leading slash (e.g., Service/Method instead of /Service/Method). While the server successfully routed these requests to the correct handler, authorization interceptors (including the official grpc/authz package) evaluated the raw, non-canonical path string. Consequently, "deny" rules defined using canonical paths (starting with /) failed to match the incoming request, allowing it to bypass the policy if a fallback "allow" rule was present. This affects gRPC-Go servers that use path-based authorization interceptors, such as the official RBAC implementation in google.golang.org/grpc/authz or custom interceptors relying on info.FullMethod or grpc.Method(ctx).

AND that have a security policy contains specific "deny" rules for canonical paths but allows other requests by default (a fallback "allow" rule). The vulnerability is exploitable by an attacker who can send raw HTTP/2 frames with malformed :path headers directly to the gRPC server. The fix in version 1.79.3 ensures that any request with a :path that does not start with a leading slash is immediately rejected with a codes.Unimplemented error, preventing it from reaching authorization interceptors or handlers with a non-canonical path string. While upgrading is the most secure and recommended path, users can mitigate the vulnerability using one of the following methods: Use a validating interceptor (recommended mitigation)

infrastructure-level normalization.

and/or policy hardening.

CRITICAL · CVSS 9.1 EPSS 0.0002
Schedule remediation
  • SSVC automatable: yes - attacks can be scripted at scale
  • CVSS base score ≥ 7.0
Sigma rules0 YARA rules0
Look this up elsewhere - one-click external pivots
How to read a CVE - triage first, then detect and patch
This page is every public fact about CVE-2026-33186, cross-linked. Its job is to answer one question fast - does this need my attention now? - and then hand you the two things you do about it. Here is how an analyst reads it.
Triage: should I act now? Four signals, and they are not interchangeable:
CVSSseverity - how bad it is IF exploited, 0-10. A high CVSS alone is not urgency; a flaw can be a perfect 10 and never actually be attacked. EPSSprobability - a model’s estimate of the chance it is exploited in the next 30 days, 0-1. This is the “will it actually happen” signal. CISA KEVconfirmed - it is being exploited in the wild right now. The strongest signal on the page; KEV beats any score. Weaponisedavailability - public exploits / PoCs, and especially Metasploit modules rated Excellent / Great. Reliable, packaged exploit code means low-skill attackers can use it today.
How they combine: KEV, or a dependable Metasploit module, means patch now regardless of CVSS. High CVSS + low EPSS + no exploit is real but not an emergency - schedule it. Low CVSS but KEV-listed still gets patched now. The verdict above already weighed these for you; this is how it got there.
Then what - two workflows:
Detectwhen you cannot patch today, follow this CVE to the ATT&CK techniques it enables, then Build a SIEM detection (the green button) - author a rule, test it in Atomic, deploy it. That buys visibility while the patch waits. PatchAffected products / packages tell you if you are exposed; Fixed versions by distribution and Vendor advisories give the exact version that closes it.
Reading order for the panels below: verdict + badges, then Public exploits / Metasploit (is it weaponised), then ATT&CK techniques + Sigma / IDS rules (can I detect it), then Affected products / packages + Fixed versions (am I exposed, what patches it), then Threat actors / IOCs (who uses it), then Scoring & timeline / references (the evidence).

Weakness Classification

Affected Products & Versions

1
grpc< 1.79.3

Affected Packages

1
Language-ecosystem packages (from OSV) tied to this CVE, with the version that fixes it - the dependency-level detail NVD doesn’t carry.
Go google.golang.org/grpc CRITICAL fixed in 1.79.3
📦

Fixed versions by distribution

54
The package version that resolves this CVE on each Linux distribution, from the vendor’s published security data. fixed in shows a patched version exists; open means the package is listed as affected with no fix yet.
alpine edgerclone fixed in 1.73.5-r0
rhel 8rhc fixed in 1:0.2.5-6.el8_10
rhel 9image-builder open
rhel 9opentelemetry-collector open
rhel 9osbuild-composer open
rhel 9osbuild-composer-core fixed in 0:165.1-2.el9_8
rhel 9osbuild-composer-worker fixed in 0:165.1-2.el9_8
rhel 9rhc open
rhel 9rhc-devel open
suse sle15aws-iam-authenticator open
suse sle15azure-storage-azcopy fixed in 0:10.29.1-150400.9.6.1
suse sle15buildah open
suse sle15distribution-registry open
suse sle15docker-libnetwork open
suse sle15golang-github-prometheus-node_exporter fixed in 0:1.10.2-150100.3.41.2
suse sle15golang-github-prometheus-prometheus fixed in 0:3.5.3-150100.4.34.1
suse sle15google-cloud-sap-agent fixed in 0:3.12-150100.3.63.1
suse sle15grafana fixed in 0:11.6.14+security01-150200.3.88.1
suse sle15helm open
suse sle15helm-bash-completion open
suse sle15helm-fish-completion open
suse sle15helm-zsh-completion open
suse sle15ignition fixed in 0:2.14.0-150400.9.15.1
suse sle15ignition-dracut-grub2 fixed in 0:2.14.0-150400.9.15.1
suse sle15kubernetes-client open
suse sle15kubernetes-common open
suse sle15kubernetes1.18-client open
suse sle15kubernetes1.18-client-common open
suse sle15kubernetes1.23-client open
suse sle15kubernetes1.23-client-common open
suse sle15kubernetes1.24-client open
suse sle15kubernetes1.24-client-common open
suse sle15kubernetes1.25-client open
suse sle15kubernetes1.25-client-common open
suse sle15kubernetes1.26-client open
suse sle15kubernetes1.26-client-common open
suse sle15kubernetes1.27-client open
suse sle15kubernetes1.27-client-common open
suse sle15kubernetes1.28-client open
suse sle15kubernetes1.28-client-common open
suse sle15kubernetes1.33-client open
suse sle15kubernetes1.33-client-bash-completion open
suse sle15kubernetes1.33-client-common open
suse sle15kubernetes1.35-client open
suse sle15kubernetes1.35-client-bash-completion open
suse sle15kubernetes1.35-client-common open
suse sle15skopeo open
suse sle15skopeo-bash-completion open
suse sle15skopeo-zsh-completion open
suse sle15terraform-provider-local fixed in 0:2.0.0-150200.6.8.1
suse sle15terraform-provider-null fixed in 0:3.0.0-150200.6.12.1
suse sle15terraform-provider-random fixed in 0:3.0.0-150200.6.6.2
suse sle15terraform-provider-tls fixed in 0:3.0.0-150200.5.6.2
suse sle15zypper-docker fixed in 0:2.0.2-150000.3.8.1

Scoring & Timeline

9.1
CRITICAL · CVSS v3.1 · [email protected]
View on NVD
Attack Vector
Network Adjacent Local Physical
Attack Complexity
Low High
Privileges Required
None Low High
User Interaction
None Required
Scope
Unchanged Changed
Confidentiality
None Low High
Integrity
None Low High
Availability
None Low High
Published to NVD20 Mar 2026 · 11:16 PM
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
SSVC triage · cisa-vulnrichment
Exploitation
none
Automatable
yes
Technical impact
partial
SSVC asks the questions that actually drive patch urgency: is it being exploited, can attacks be automated, and how total is the impact.

Vendor Advisories

30
suse-csafopenSUSE-SU-2026:11015-1
suse-csafSUSE-SU-2026:2347-1
suse-csafopenSUSE-SU-2026:20940-1
suse-csafSUSE-SU-2026:22065-1
suse-csafSUSE-SU-2026:22066-1
🔗

References & Sources

1
Source URLs (vendor pages, mailing lists, write-ups). Exploit/PoC links are in their own section above to avoid duplication.
SOC and Response
CVE triage
Stack monitoring
Am I affected
IOC triage
KEV catalog
Daily brief
Change tracking
Detection Engineering
Coverage workspace
Detection coverage
Coverage check
Telemetry ceiling
SIEM query builder
Sigma rules
SIEM rules
YARA rules
Network rules
D3FEND
Threat Hunting
Threat actors
ATT&CK techniques
Attack paths
Indicators
Atomic tests
Red Team and Pentest
Exploitability triage
Recon pack
Attack paths
CAPEC patterns
Adversary emulation
Compliance and GRC
Framework mapping
Control assessment
Audit view
Coverage report
Atlas Search Threat actors Techniques Tools & malware CWE CAPEC KEV catalog Package vulns TAXII feed Data sources
About All capabilities Pricing API docs Live status Privacy policy Terms of service
threatengine.sh