Home/CVE/A weakness has been identified in crater-invoice-inc crater up to 6.0.6. This affects the function getFormattedString of
CVE
CVE-2026-14791
A weakness has been identified in crater-invoice-inc crater up to 6.0.6. This affects the function getFormattedString of
A weakness has been identified in crater-invoice-inc crater up to 6.0.6. This affects the function getFormattedString of the file app/Http/Requests/InvoicesRequest.php of the component Invoice Note Handler. Executing a manipulation of the argument notes can lead to cross site scripting.
The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
LOW · CVSS 3.5
EPSS 0.00203
EPSS exploitation odds0.20% · top 89%
Monitor
- No active-exploitation, high-EPSS, or public-exploit signals - routine patching cadence
No Sigma yet — build one →
YARA rules0
Look this up elsewhere - one-click external pivots
▸
How to read a CVE - triage first, then detect and patch
This page is every public fact about CVE-2026-14791, cross-linked. Its job is to answer one question fast - does this need my attention now? - and then hand you the two things you do about it. Here is how an analyst reads it.
Triage: should I act now? Four signals, and they are not interchangeable:
CVSSseverity - how bad it is IF exploited, 0-10. A high CVSS alone is not urgency; a flaw can be a perfect 10 and never actually be attacked.
EPSSprobability - a model’s estimate of the chance it is exploited in the next 30 days, 0-1. This is the “will it actually happen” signal.
CISA KEVconfirmed - it is being exploited in the wild right now. The strongest signal on the page; KEV beats any score.
Weaponisedavailability - public exploits / PoCs, and especially Metasploit modules rated Excellent / Great. Reliable, packaged exploit code means low-skill attackers can use it today.
How they combine: KEV, or a dependable Metasploit module, means patch now regardless of CVSS. High CVSS + low EPSS + no exploit is real but not an emergency - schedule it. Low CVSS but KEV-listed still gets patched now. The verdict above already weighed these for you; this is how it got there.
Then what - two workflows:
Detectwhen you cannot patch today, follow this CVE to the ATT&CK techniques it enables, then Build a SIEM detection (the green button) - author a rule, test it in Atomic, deploy it. That buys visibility while the patch waits.
PatchAffected products / packages tell you if you are exposed; Fixed versions by distribution and Vendor advisories give the exact version that closes it.
Reading order for the panels below: verdict + badges, then Public exploits / Metasploit (is it weaponised), then ATT&CK techniques + Sigma / IDS rules (can I detect it), then Affected products / packages + Fixed versions (am I exposed, what patches it), then Threat actors / IOCs (who uses it), then Scoring & timeline / references (the evidence).
EPSS exploitation probability
0.20%
Top 89%odds of exploitation in the next 30 days
CVSS metric silhouette
shape grows toward worst-case
SSVC triage · cisa-vulnrichment
Exploitation
poc
Automatable
no
Tech impact
partial
CVSS vector breakdown
Exploitability - how they get in
Attack Vector
Network
Adjacent
Local
Physical
Attack Complexity
Low
High
Privileges Required
None
Low
High
User Interaction
None
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Changed
Impact - what breaks
Confidentiality
None
Low
High
Integrity
None
Low
High
Availability
None
Low
High
VECTOR
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N◆
ATT&CK techniques
5Techniques this CVE enables. Pills with a solid outline are high confidence - named directly in ATT&CK or Nuclei, or human-curated by CTID; the rest are inferred from the weakness type using MITRE's CVE Mapping Methodology and the CWE → CAPEC chain. Broad, generic-weakness guesses are filtered out. A small N× marks a technique that N independent sources agree on.
T1027.006 · HTML Smuggling T1027.009 · Embedded Payloads T1059 · Command and Scripting Interpreter T1059.007 · JavaScript T1564.009 · Resource Forking
▤ Build a SIEM detection for these techniques
▤
CAPEC attack patterns
9Attack patterns this CVE enables - the bridge from weakness to ATT&CK technique.
CAPEC-CAPEC-209 · XSS Using MIME Type Mismatch CAPEC-CAPEC-242 · Code Injection CAPEC-CAPEC-35 · Leverage Executable Code in Non-Executable Files CAPEC-CAPEC-588 · DOM-Based XSS CAPEC-CAPEC-591 · Reflected XSS CAPEC-CAPEC-592 · Stored XSS CAPEC-CAPEC-63 · Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) CAPEC-CAPEC-77 · Manipulating User-Controlled Variables CAPEC-CAPEC-85 · AJAX Footprinting
⬡
Weakness Classification
▤
Related CVEs
8CVEs linked to this one by a shared weakness (CWE) or affected product - joins on data already in the engine, with the reason shown per row.
CVE-2000-1205
Cross site scripting vulnerabilities in Apache 1.3.0 through 1.3.11 allow remote...
same CWE-79
CVE-2002-0270
Opera, when configured with the "Determine action by MIME type" option disabled,...
same CWE-79
CVE-2002-1651
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Verity Search97 allows remote attack...
same CWE-79
CVE-2002-1700
Cross-site scripting vulnerability (XSS) in the missing template handler in Macr...
1
same CWE-79
CVE-1999-0509
Perl, sh, csh, or other shell interpreters are installed in the cgi-bin director...
same CWE-94
CVE-1999-0491
The prompt parsing in bash allows a local user to execute commands as another us...
1
same CWE-94
CVE-1999-0891
The "download behavior" in Internet Explorer 5 allows remote attackers to read a...
1
same CWE-94
CVE-1999-0702
Internet Explorer 5.0 and 5.01 allows remote attackers to modify or execute file...
1
same CWE-94
🔗
References & Sources
6Source URLs (vendor pages, mailing lists, write-ups). Exploit/PoC links are in their own section above to avoid duplication.