Home/CVE/A vulnerability was identified in vxcontrol PentAGI up to 2.1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file backend/pk
CVE
CVE-2026-14784
A vulnerability was identified in vxcontrol PentAGI up to 2.1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file backend/pk
A vulnerability was identified in vxcontrol PentAGI up to 2.1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file backend/pkg/docker/client.go of the component Docker API. The manipulation leads to sandbox issue.
The attack may be initiated remotely. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.
MEDIUM · CVSS 6.3
EPSS 0.00228
EPSS exploitation odds0.23% · top 86%
Monitor
- No active-exploitation, high-EPSS, or public-exploit signals - routine patching cadence
No Sigma yet — build one →
YARA rules0
Look this up elsewhere - one-click external pivots
▸
How to read a CVE - triage first, then detect and patch
This page is every public fact about CVE-2026-14784, cross-linked. Its job is to answer one question fast - does this need my attention now? - and then hand you the two things you do about it. Here is how an analyst reads it.
Triage: should I act now? Four signals, and they are not interchangeable:
CVSSseverity - how bad it is IF exploited, 0-10. A high CVSS alone is not urgency; a flaw can be a perfect 10 and never actually be attacked.
EPSSprobability - a model’s estimate of the chance it is exploited in the next 30 days, 0-1. This is the “will it actually happen” signal.
CISA KEVconfirmed - it is being exploited in the wild right now. The strongest signal on the page; KEV beats any score.
Weaponisedavailability - public exploits / PoCs, and especially Metasploit modules rated Excellent / Great. Reliable, packaged exploit code means low-skill attackers can use it today.
How they combine: KEV, or a dependable Metasploit module, means patch now regardless of CVSS. High CVSS + low EPSS + no exploit is real but not an emergency - schedule it. Low CVSS but KEV-listed still gets patched now. The verdict above already weighed these for you; this is how it got there.
Then what - two workflows:
Detectwhen you cannot patch today, follow this CVE to the ATT&CK techniques it enables, then Build a SIEM detection (the green button) - author a rule, test it in Atomic, deploy it. That buys visibility while the patch waits.
PatchAffected products / packages tell you if you are exposed; Fixed versions by distribution and Vendor advisories give the exact version that closes it.
Reading order for the panels below: verdict + badges, then Public exploits / Metasploit (is it weaponised), then ATT&CK techniques + Sigma / IDS rules (can I detect it), then Affected products / packages + Fixed versions (am I exposed, what patches it), then Threat actors / IOCs (who uses it), then Scoring & timeline / references (the evidence).
EPSS exploitation probability
0.23%
Top 86%odds of exploitation in the next 30 days
CVSS metric silhouette
shape grows toward worst-case
SSVC triage · cisa-vulnrichment
Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Tech impact
partial
CVSS vector breakdown
Exploitability - how they get in
Attack Vector
Network
Adjacent
Local
Physical
Attack Complexity
Low
High
Privileges Required
None
Low
High
User Interaction
None
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Changed
Impact - what breaks
Confidentiality
None
Low
High
Integrity
None
Low
High
Availability
None
Low
High
VECTOR
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L◆
ATT&CK techniques
1Techniques this CVE enables. Pills with a solid outline are high confidence - named directly in ATT&CK or Nuclei, or human-curated by CTID; the rest are inferred from the weakness type using MITRE's CVE Mapping Methodology and the CWE → CAPEC chain. Broad, generic-weakness guesses are filtered out. A small N× marks a technique that N independent sources agree on.
▤ Build a SIEM detection for these techniques⬡
Weakness Classification
▤
Related CVEs
8CVEs linked to this one by a shared weakness (CWE) or affected product - joins on data already in the engine, with the reason shown per row.
CVE-1999-1383
(1) bash before 1.14.7, and (2) tcsh 6.05 allow local users to gain privileges v...
same CWE-264
CVE-1999-0496
A Windows NT 4.0 user can gain administrative rights by forcing NtOpenProcessTok...
same CWE-264
CVE-1999-0227
Access violation in LSASS.EXE (LSA/LSARPC) program in Windows NT allows a denial...
same CWE-264
CVE-1999-0344
NT users can gain debug-level access on a system process using the Sechole explo...
same CWE-264
CVE-2020-1889
A security feature bypass issue in WhatsApp Desktop versions prior to v0.3.4932 ...
same CWE-265
CRITICAL
CVE-2023-26122
All versions of the package safe-eval are vulnerable to Sandbox Bypass due to im...
same CWE-265
HIGH
CVE-2023-5223
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in HimitZH HOJ...
same CWE-265
MEDIUM
CVE-2024-2007
A vulnerability was found in OpenBMB XAgent 1.0.0. It has been declared as criti...
same CWE-265
MEDIUM
🔗
References & Sources
7Source URLs (vendor pages, mailing lists, write-ups). Exploit/PoC links are in their own section above to avoid duplication.