Home/CVE/In the Drupal 7 Internationalization (i18n) module, the i18n_node submodule allows a user with both "Translate content"
CVE
↯ PDF report Light Dark

CVE-2026-07482

In the Drupal 7 Internationalization (i18n) module, the i18n_node submodule allows a user with both "Translate content"

In the Drupal 7 Internationalization (i18n) module, the i18n_node submodule allows a user with both "Translate content" and "Administer content translations" permissions to view and attach unpublished nodes via the translation UI and its autocomplete widget. This bypasses intended access controls and discloses unpublished node titles and IDs. Exploit affects versions 7.x-1.0 up to and including 7.x-1.35.

MEDIUM · CVSS 4.3 EPSS 0.00035
EPSS exploitation odds0.03% · top 89%
Schedule remediation
  • Public exploit or PoC is available
  • SSVC automatable: yes - attacks can be scripted at scale
No Sigma yet — build one → YARA rules0
Look this up elsewhere - one-click external pivots
NVDCVE.orgCISAExploit-DBGitHub PoCVulnCheck KEVGreyNoise
▸ How to read a CVE - triage first, then detect and patch
This page is every public fact about CVE-2026-0748, cross-linked. Its job is to answer one question fast - does this need my attention now? - and then hand you the two things you do about it. Here is how an analyst reads it.
Triage: should I act now? Four signals, and they are not interchangeable:
CVSSseverity - how bad it is IF exploited, 0-10. A high CVSS alone is not urgency; a flaw can be a perfect 10 and never actually be attacked. EPSSprobability - a model’s estimate of the chance it is exploited in the next 30 days, 0-1. This is the “will it actually happen” signal. CISA KEVconfirmed - it is being exploited in the wild right now. The strongest signal on the page; KEV beats any score. Weaponisedavailability - public exploits / PoCs, and especially Metasploit modules rated Excellent / Great. Reliable, packaged exploit code means low-skill attackers can use it today.
How they combine: KEV, or a dependable Metasploit module, means patch now regardless of CVSS. High CVSS + low EPSS + no exploit is real but not an emergency - schedule it. Low CVSS but KEV-listed still gets patched now. The verdict above already weighed these for you; this is how it got there.
Then what - two workflows:
Detectwhen you cannot patch today, follow this CVE to the ATT&CK techniques it enables, then Build a SIEM detection (the green button) - author a rule, test it in Atomic, deploy it. That buys visibility while the patch waits. PatchAffected products / packages tell you if you are exposed; Fixed versions by distribution and Vendor advisories give the exact version that closes it.
Reading order for the panels below: verdict + badges, then Public exploits / Metasploit (is it weaponised), then ATT&CK techniques + Sigma / IDS rules (can I detect it), then Affected products / packages + Fixed versions (am I exposed, what patches it), then Threat actors / IOCs (who uses it), then Scoring & timeline / references (the evidence).
▣

Severity & exploitation scoring

View on NVD →
CVSS base score
4.3
MEDIUMCVSS v3.1 · [email protected]
EPSS exploitation probability
0.03%
Top 89%odds of exploitation in the next 30 days
CVSS metric silhouette
VectorComplexityPrivilegesInteractionScopeConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
shape grows toward worst-case
SSVC triage · cisa-vulnrichment
Exploitation
poc
Automatable
yes
Tech impact
partial
CVSS vector breakdown
Exploitability - how they get in
Attack Vector
Network Adjacent Local Physical
Attack Complexity
Low High
Privileges Required
None Low High
User Interaction
None Required
Scope
Unchanged Changed
Impact - what breaks
Confidentiality
None Low High
Integrity
None Low High
Availability
None Low High
VECTORCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Lifecycle
  1. 26 Mar 2026Published to NVD
  2. 01 Apr 2026Last modified
Every entry is a recorded date - NVD publish/modify, CISA KEV add, public exploit disclosure. No inferred events.
⚠

Public Exploits & PoCs

2
These PoC and exploit links come from public sources and are not verified to be safe or functional. Review the code before running anything, and treat unverified entries as untrusted. Signed-in users mark whether it works, rate 1-10, and can report malware with a required reason that becomes a public comment.
poc www.herodevs.com · cve-2026-0748↗ www.herodevs.com
⋮
Vote & rate
Report or claim
⚠ Report this PoC

Becomes a public comment attributed as First L. (never full last name). Don't include private info. Rate-limited: 5/hour.

Works? no reports yet
Rating -
poc www.herodevs.com · cve-2026-0748?nes-for-drupal-7↗ www.herodevs.com
⋮
Vote & rate
Report or claim
⚠ Report this PoC

Becomes a public comment attributed as First L. (never full last name). Don't include private info. Rate-limited: 5/hour.

Works? no reports yet
Rating -
◆

ATT&CK techniques

1

Techniques this CVE enables - linked via CWE → CAPEC → ATT&CK. Pills with a solid outline are named directly in ATT&CK or Nuclei templates (high confidence); the others are linked through weakness mappings.

T1078 · Valid Accounts
▤ Build a SIEM detection for these techniques
▤

CAPEC attack patterns

12

Attack patterns this CVE enables - the bridge from weakness to ATT&CK technique.

CAPEC-CAPEC-1 · Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs CAPEC-CAPEC-127 · Directory Indexing CAPEC-CAPEC-19 · Embedding Scripts within Scripts CAPEC-CAPEC-441 · Malicious Logic Insertion CAPEC-CAPEC-478 · Modification of Windows Service Configuration CAPEC-CAPEC-479 · Malicious Root Certificate CAPEC-CAPEC-502 · Intent Spoof CAPEC-CAPEC-503 · WebView Exposure CAPEC-CAPEC-536 · Data Injected During Configuration CAPEC-CAPEC-546 · Incomplete Data Deletion in a Multi-Tenant Environment CAPEC-CAPEC-550 · Install New Service CAPEC-CAPEC-551 · Modify Existing Service
⬡

Weakness Classification

CWE-276Incorrect Default Permissions
CWE-284Improper Access Control
▤

Affected Products & Versions

1
internationalization project internationalization>= 7.x-1.0 and <= 7.x-1.35
▤

Related CVEs

8
CVEs linked to this one by a shared weakness (CWE) or affected product - joins on data already in the engine, with the reason shown per row. Not a guess.
CVE-1999-0426 The default permissions of /dev/kmem in Linux versions before 2.0.36 allows IP s... same CWE-276 CRITICAL CVE-2001-0497 dnskeygen in BIND 8.2.4 and earlier, and dnssec-keygen in BIND 9.1.2 and earlier... same CWE-276 HIGH CVE-2002-1713 The Standard security setting for Mandrake-Security package (msec) in Mandrake 8... same CWE-276 MEDIUM CVE-2002-1844 Microsoft Windows Media Player (WMP) 6.3, when installed on Solaris, installs ex... same CWE-276 HIGH CVE-2001-0781 Buffer overflow in SpoonFTP 1.0.0.12 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrar... same CWE-284 CVE-2008-2947 Cross-domain vulnerability in Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.01 SP4, 6, and 7 all... same CWE-284 CVE-2009-2092 IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 7.0 before 7.0.0.5 does not properly read... same CWE-284 CVE-2009-2631 Multiple clientless SSL VPN products that run in web browsers, including Stoneso... same CWE-284
🔗

References & Sources

1
Source URLs (vendor pages, mailing lists, write-ups). Exploit/PoC links are in their own section above to avoid duplication.
https://d7es.tag1.com/node/86Third Party Advisory
◈SOC and Response
◆Detection Engineering
◎Threat Hunting
▲Red Team and Pentest
■Compliance and GRC
◯About
threatengine.sh