Home/CVE/A vulnerability was found in pgadmin. Users logging into pgAdmin running in server mode using LDAP authentication may be
CVE
CVE-2023-1907
A vulnerability was found in pgadmin. Users logging into pgAdmin running in server mode using LDAP authentication may be
A vulnerability was found in pgadmin. Users logging into pgAdmin running in server mode using LDAP authentication may be attached to another user's session if multiple connection attempts occur simultaneously.
HIGH · CVSS 8
EPSS 0.0044
EPSS exploitation odds0.44% · top 64%
Schedule remediation
- CVSS base score ≥ 7.0
No Sigma yet — build one →
YARA rules0
Look this up elsewhere - one-click external pivots
▸
How to read a CVE - triage first, then detect and patch
This page is every public fact about CVE-2023-1907, cross-linked. Its job is to answer one question fast - does this need my attention now? - and then hand you the two things you do about it. Here is how an analyst reads it.
Triage: should I act now? Four signals, and they are not interchangeable:
CVSSseverity - how bad it is IF exploited, 0-10. A high CVSS alone is not urgency; a flaw can be a perfect 10 and never actually be attacked.
EPSSprobability - a model’s estimate of the chance it is exploited in the next 30 days, 0-1. This is the “will it actually happen” signal.
CISA KEVconfirmed - it is being exploited in the wild right now. The strongest signal on the page; KEV beats any score.
Weaponisedavailability - public exploits / PoCs, and especially Metasploit modules rated Excellent / Great. Reliable, packaged exploit code means low-skill attackers can use it today.
How they combine: KEV, or a dependable Metasploit module, means patch now regardless of CVSS. High CVSS + low EPSS + no exploit is real but not an emergency - schedule it. Low CVSS but KEV-listed still gets patched now. The verdict above already weighed these for you; this is how it got there.
Then what - two workflows:
Detectwhen you cannot patch today, follow this CVE to the ATT&CK techniques it enables, then Build a SIEM detection (the green button) - author a rule, test it in Atomic, deploy it. That buys visibility while the patch waits.
PatchAffected products / packages tell you if you are exposed; Fixed versions by distribution and Vendor advisories give the exact version that closes it.
Reading order for the panels below: verdict + badges, then Public exploits / Metasploit (is it weaponised), then ATT&CK techniques + Sigma / IDS rules (can I detect it), then Affected products / packages + Fixed versions (am I exposed, what patches it), then Threat actors / IOCs (who uses it), then Scoring & timeline / references (the evidence).
EPSS exploitation probability
0.44%
Top 64%odds of exploitation in the next 30 days
CVSS metric silhouette
shape grows toward worst-case
SSVC triage · cisa-vulnrichment
Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Tech impact
total
CVSS vector breakdown
Exploitability - how they get in
Attack Vector
Network
Adjacent
Local
Physical
Attack Complexity
Low
High
Privileges Required
None
Low
High
User Interaction
None
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Changed
Impact - what breaks
Confidentiality
None
Low
High
Integrity
None
Low
High
Availability
None
Low
High
VECTOR
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:HLifecycle
- 09 Jan 2025Published to NVD
- 17 Jun 2026Last modified
Every entry is a recorded date - NVD publish/modify, CISA KEV add, public exploit disclosure. No inferred events.
Attack path
Full kill chain
◆
ATT&CK techniques
4Techniques this CVE enables. Pills with a solid outline are high confidence - named directly in ATT&CK or Nuclei, or human-curated by CTID; the rest are inferred from the weakness type using MITRE's CVE Mapping Methodology and the CWE → CAPEC chain. Broad, generic-weakness guesses are filtered out. A small N× marks a technique that N independent sources agree on.
T1083 · File and Directory Discovery T1134.001 · Token Impersonation/Theft T1550.004 · Web Session Cookie T1574.010 · Services File Permissions Weakness
▤ Build a SIEM detection for these techniques
▤
CAPEC attack patterns
5Attack patterns this CVE enables - the bridge from weakness to ATT&CK technique.
⬡
Weakness Classification
▤
Affected Products & Versions
1pgadmin< 7.0
▤
Affected Packages
1Language-ecosystem packages (from OSV) tied to this CVE, with the version that fixes it - the dependency-level detail NVD doesn’t carry.
PyPI
pgadmin4
HIGH
fixed in 7.0
▤
Related CVEs
8CVEs linked to this one by a shared weakness (CWE) or affected product - joins on data already in the engine, with the reason shown per row.
CVE-1999-0426
The default permissions of /dev/kmem in Linux versions before 2.0.36 allows IP s...
1
same CWE-276
CRITICAL
CVE-2001-0497
dnskeygen in BIND 8.2.4 and earlier, and dnssec-keygen in BIND 9.1.2 and earlier...
same CWE-276
HIGH
CVE-2002-1713
The Standard security setting for Mandrake-Security package (msec) in Mandrake 8...
same CWE-276
MEDIUM
CVE-2002-1844
Microsoft Windows Media Player (WMP) 6.3, when installed on Solaris, installs ex...
same CWE-276
HIGH
CVE-2022-40210
Exposure of data element to wrong session in the Intel DCM software before versi...
same CWE-488
MEDIUM
CVE-2023-6519
Exposure of Data Element to Wrong Session vulnerability in Mia Technology Inc. M...
same CWE-488
HIGH
CVE-2024-27455
In the Bentley ALIM Web application, certain configuration settings can cause ex...
same CWE-488
CRITICAL
CVE-2024-1223
This vulnerability potentially allows unauthorized enumeration of information fr...
same CWE-488
MEDIUM
📦
Fixed versions by distribution
2The package version that resolves this CVE on each Linux distribution, from the vendor’s published security data. fixed in shows a patched version exists; open means the package is listed as affected with no fix yet.
suse sle15pgadmin4 fixed in 0:4.30-150300.3.18.1
suse sle15pgadmin4-web open
⚑
Vendor Advisories
2suse-csafSUSE-SU-2025:01326-1
suse-csafSUSE-SU-2025:1326-1
🔗
References & Sources
2Source URLs (vendor pages, mailing lists, write-ups). Exploit/PoC links are in their own section above to avoid duplication.