CVE-2021-40341

Home/CVE/DES cipher, which has inadequate encryption strength, is used Hitachi Energy FOXMAN-UN to encrypt user credentials used

CVE

DES cipher, which has inadequate encryption strength, is used Hitachi Energy FOXMAN-UN to encrypt user credentials used

DES cipher, which has inadequate encryption strength, is used Hitachi Energy FOXMAN-UN to encrypt user credentials used to access the Network Elements. Successful exploitation allows sensitive information to be decrypted easily. This issue affects FOXMAN-UN product: FOXMAN-UN R16A, FOXMAN-UN R15B, FOXMAN-UN R15A, FOXMAN-UN R14B, FOXMAN-UN R14A, FOXMAN-UN R11B, FOXMAN-UN R11A, FOXMAN-UN R10C, FOXMAN-UN R9C; UNEM product: UNEM R16A, UNEM R15B, UNEM R15A, UNEM R14B, UNEM R14A, UNEM R11B, UNEM R11A, UNEM R10C, UNEM R9C. List of CPEs: cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman-un:R16A::::::: cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman-un:R15B::::::: cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman-un:R15A::::::: cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman-un:R14B::::::: cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman-un:R14A::::::: cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman-un:R11B::::::: cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman-un:R11A::::::: cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman-un:R10C::::::: cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman-un:R9C::::::: cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:unem:R16A::::::: cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:unem:R15B::::::: cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:unem:R15A::::::: cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:unem:R14B::::::: cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:unem:R14A::::::: cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:unem:R11B::::::: cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:unem:R11A::::::: cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:unem:R10C::::::: cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:unem:R9C:::::::.

HIGH · CVSS 7.1 EPSS 0.00032

Schedule remediation

CVSS base score ≥ 7.0

Sigma rules0 YARA rules0

Look this up elsewhere - one-click external pivots

NVD CVE.org CISA Vulners Exploit-DB GitHub PoC VulnCheck KEV GreyNoise

▸ How to read a CVE - triage first, then detect and patch

This page is every public fact about CVE-2021-40341, cross-linked. Its job is to answer one question fast - does this need my attention now? - and then hand you the two things you do about it. Here is how an analyst reads it.

Triage: should I act now? Four signals, and they are not interchangeable:

CVSSseverity - how bad it is IF exploited, 0-10. A high CVSS alone is not urgency; a flaw can be a perfect 10 and never actually be attacked. EPSSprobability - a model’s estimate of the chance it is exploited in the next 30 days, 0-1. This is the “will it actually happen” signal. CISA KEVconfirmed - it is being exploited in the wild right now. The strongest signal on the page; KEV beats any score. Weaponisedavailability - public exploits / PoCs, and especially Metasploit modules rated Excellent / Great. Reliable, packaged exploit code means low-skill attackers can use it today.

How they combine: KEV, or a dependable Metasploit module, means patch now regardless of CVSS. High CVSS + low EPSS + no exploit is real but not an emergency - schedule it. Low CVSS but KEV-listed still gets patched now. The verdict above already weighed these for you; this is how it got there.

Then what - two workflows:

Detectwhen you cannot patch today, follow this CVE to the ATT&CK techniques it enables, then Build a SIEM detection (the green button) - author a rule, test it in Atomic, deploy it. That buys visibility while the patch waits. PatchAffected products / packages tell you if you are exposed; Fixed versions by distribution and Vendor advisories give the exact version that closes it.

Reading order for the panels below: verdict + badges, then Public exploits / Metasploit (is it weaponised), then ATT&CK techniques + Sigma / IDS rules (can I detect it), then Affected products / packages + Fixed versions (am I exposed, what patches it), then Threat actors / IOCs (who uses it), then Scoring & timeline / references (the evidence).

View attack path from CVE-2021-40341

◆

ATT&CK techniques

Techniques this CVE enables - linked via CWECAPECATT&CK. High◆ = named directly in ATT&CK or Nuclei templates.

T1110 · Brute Force

▤ Build a SIEM detection for these techniques

▤

CAPEC attack patterns

Attack patterns this CVE enables - the bridge from weakness to ATT&CK technique.

CAPEC-CAPEC-112 · Brute Force CAPEC-CAPEC-192 · Protocol Analysis CAPEC-CAPEC-20 · Encryption Brute Forcing

⬡

Weakness Classification

CWE-326Inadequate Encryption Strength

▤

Affected Products & Versions

hitachienergy foxman-unall versions

hitachienergy unemall versions

▣

Scoring & Timeline

7.1

HIGH · CVSS v3.1 · [email protected]

View on NVD

Attack Vector

Network Adjacent Local Physical

Attack Complexity

Low High

Privileges Required

None Low High

User Interaction

None Required

Scope

Unchanged Changed

Confidentiality

None Low High

Integrity

None Low High

Availability

None Low High

Published to NVD05 Jan 2023 · 10:15 PM

CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

SSVC triage · cisa-vulnrichment

Exploitation

none

Automatable

Technical impact

partial

SSVC asks the questions that actually drive patch urgency: is it being exploited, can attacks be automated, and how total is the impact.

⚑

Vendor Advisories

cisa-csafcisa-csaf-csaf_files-OT-white-2023-icsa-23-005-01

cisa-csafcisa-csaf-csaf_files-OT-white-2023-icsa-23-005-02

🔗

References & Sources

Source URLs (vendor pages, mailing lists, write-ups). Exploit/PoC links are in their own section above to avoid duplication.

https://search.abb.com/library/Download.aspx?DocumentID=8DBD000083&LanguageCode=en&DocumentPartId=&Action=LaunchMitigationVendor Advisory

https://search.abb.com/library/Download.aspx?DocumentID=8DBD000084&LanguageCode=en&DocumentPartId=&Action=LaunchMitigationVendor Advisory