Home/CVE/Buffer overflow can occur in wlan module if supported rates or extended rates element length is greater than max rate se
CVE
CVE-2019-105661
Buffer overflow can occur in wlan module if supported rates or extended rates element length is greater than max rate se
Buffer overflow can occur in wlan module if supported rates or extended rates element length is greater than max rate set length in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Consumer Electronics Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music in APQ8017, APQ8053, APQ8096AU, MDM9206, MDM9207C, MDM9607, MDM9650, MSM8905, MSM8996AU, Nicobar, QCA6174A, QCA6574AU, QCA9377, QCA9379, QCN7605, QCS405, QCS605, SDA845, SDM670, SDM710, SDM845, SDX20, SM6150, SM8150, SM8250, SXR2130.
HIGH · CVSS 7.8
EPSS 0.00188
EPSS exploitation odds0.19% · top 91%
Act now
- Public exploit or PoC is available
- CVSS base score ≥ 7.0
No Sigma yet — build one →
YARA rules0
Look this up elsewhere - one-click external pivots
▸
How to read a CVE - triage first, then detect and patch
This page is every public fact about CVE-2019-10566, cross-linked. Its job is to answer one question fast - does this need my attention now? - and then hand you the two things you do about it. Here is how an analyst reads it.
Triage: should I act now? Four signals, and they are not interchangeable:
CVSSseverity - how bad it is IF exploited, 0-10. A high CVSS alone is not urgency; a flaw can be a perfect 10 and never actually be attacked.
EPSSprobability - a model’s estimate of the chance it is exploited in the next 30 days, 0-1. This is the “will it actually happen” signal.
CISA KEVconfirmed - it is being exploited in the wild right now. The strongest signal on the page; KEV beats any score.
Weaponisedavailability - public exploits / PoCs, and especially Metasploit modules rated Excellent / Great. Reliable, packaged exploit code means low-skill attackers can use it today.
How they combine: KEV, or a dependable Metasploit module, means patch now regardless of CVSS. High CVSS + low EPSS + no exploit is real but not an emergency - schedule it. Low CVSS but KEV-listed still gets patched now. The verdict above already weighed these for you; this is how it got there.
Then what - two workflows:
Detectwhen you cannot patch today, follow this CVE to the ATT&CK techniques it enables, then Build a SIEM detection (the green button) - author a rule, test it in Atomic, deploy it. That buys visibility while the patch waits.
PatchAffected products / packages tell you if you are exposed; Fixed versions by distribution and Vendor advisories give the exact version that closes it.
Reading order for the panels below: verdict + badges, then Public exploits / Metasploit (is it weaponised), then ATT&CK techniques + Sigma / IDS rules (can I detect it), then Affected products / packages + Fixed versions (am I exposed, what patches it), then Threat actors / IOCs (who uses it), then Scoring & timeline / references (the evidence).
⚠
Exploitation evidence
1 of 7 sources
Corroboration score 8/100 ·
emerging.
This counts how many independent sources have exploitation evidence, and separates two different things:
confirmed in-the-wild use (CISA KEV, Microsoft MSRC, ransomware activity) from
exploit / PoC availability (Metasploit, ExploitDB, Nuclei, public PoCs). A template or PoC existing means
an attack is possible and easy - it is not, on its own, proof the CVE is being exploited in the wild.
Exploit / PoC available
public PoC
EPSS exploitation probability
0.19%
Top 91%odds of exploitation in the next 30 days
CVSS metric silhouette
shape grows toward worst-case
SSVC triage
No SSVC vulnrichment for this CVE. CISA's Vulnrichment program scores newer CVEs (~2024 onwards) plus selected older critical ones. Use the EPSS probability + KEV status to triage instead.
CVSS vector breakdown
Exploitability - how they get in
Attack Vector
Network
Adjacent
Local
Physical
Attack Complexity
Low
High
Privileges Required
None
Low
High
User Interaction
None
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Changed
Impact - what breaks
Confidentiality
None
Low
High
Integrity
None
Low
High
Availability
None
Low
High
VECTOR
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HLifecycle
- 21 Nov 2019Published to NVD
- 17 Jun 2026Last modified
Every entry is a recorded date - NVD publish/modify, CISA KEV add, public exploit disclosure. No inferred events.
Attack path
Full kill chain
⚠
Public Exploits & PoCs
1These PoC and exploit links come from public sources and are not verified to be safe or functional. Review the code before running anything, and treat unverified entries as untrusted. Signed-in users mark whether it works, rate 1-10, and can report malware with a required reason that becomes a public comment.
Source
Works?
no reports yet
Rating
◆
ATT&CK techniques
1Techniques this CVE enables. Pills with a solid outline are high confidence - named directly in ATT&CK or Nuclei, or human-curated by CTID; the rest are inferred from the weakness type using MITRE's CVE Mapping Methodology and the CWE → CAPEC chain. Broad, generic-weakness guesses are filtered out. A small N× marks a technique that N independent sources agree on.
▤ Build a SIEM detection for these techniques▤
CAPEC attack patterns
12Attack patterns this CVE enables - the bridge from weakness to ATT&CK technique.
CAPEC-CAPEC-10 · Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables CAPEC-CAPEC-100 · Overflow Buffers CAPEC-CAPEC-14 · Client-side Injection-induced Buffer Overflow CAPEC-CAPEC-24 · Filter Failure through Buffer Overflow CAPEC-CAPEC-42 · MIME Conversion CAPEC-CAPEC-44 · Overflow Binary Resource File CAPEC-CAPEC-45 · Buffer Overflow via Symbolic Links CAPEC-CAPEC-46 · Overflow Variables and Tags CAPEC-CAPEC-47 · Buffer Overflow via Parameter Expansion CAPEC-CAPEC-67 · String Format Overflow in syslog() CAPEC-CAPEC-8 · Buffer Overflow in an API Call CAPEC-CAPEC-9 · Buffer Overflow in Local Command-Line Utilities
⬡
Weakness Classification
▤
Affected Products & Versions
26qualcomm apq8017 firmwareall versions
qualcomm apq8053 firmwareall versions
qualcomm apq8096au firmwareall versions
qualcomm mdm9206 firmwareall versions
qualcomm mdm9207c firmwareall versions
qualcomm mdm9607 firmwareall versions
qualcomm mdm9650 firmwareall versions
qualcomm msm8905 firmwareall versions
qualcomm msm8996au firmwareall versions
qualcomm nicobar firmwareall versions
qualcomm qca6174a firmwareall versions
qualcomm qca6574au firmwareall versions
qualcomm qca9377 firmwareall versions
qualcomm qca9379 firmwareall versions
qualcomm qcn7605 firmwareall versions
qualcomm qcs405 firmwareall versions
qualcomm qcs605 firmwareall versions
qualcomm sda845 firmwareall versions
qualcomm sdm670 firmwareall versions
qualcomm sdm710 firmwareall versions
qualcomm sdm845 firmwareall versions
qualcomm sdx20 firmwareall versions
qualcomm sm6150 firmwareall versions
qualcomm sm8150 firmwareall versions
qualcomm sm8250 firmwareall versions
qualcomm sxr2130 firmwareall versions
▤
Related CVEs
8CVEs linked to this one by a shared weakness (CWE) or affected product - joins on data already in the engine, with the reason shown per row.
CVE-1999-0046
Buffer overflow of rlogin program using TERM environmental variable.
1
same CWE-120
CVE-1999-0038
Buffer overflow in xlock program allows local users to execute commands as root.
2
same CWE-120
HIGH
CVE-1999-0284
Denial of service to NT mail servers including Ipswitch, Mdaemon, and Exchange t...
3
same CWE-120
CVE-1999-0385
The LDAP bind function in Exchange 5.5 has a buffer overflow that allows a remot...
same CWE-120
CVE-2017-18153
A race condition exists in a driver potentially leading to a use-after-free cond...
same product
HIGH
CVE-2018-13916
Out-of-bounds memory access in Qurt kernel function when using the identifier to...
same product
HIGH
CVE-2018-11980
When a fake broadcast/multicast 11w rmf without mmie received, since no proper l...
same product
HIGH
CVE-2018-11816
Crafted Binder Request Causes Heap UAF in MediaServer
same product
HIGH
🔗
References & Sources
1Source URLs (vendor pages, mailing lists, write-ups). Exploit/PoC links are in their own section above to avoid duplication.