Home/CVE/Microsoft Internet Explorer 6, 7, and 8 does not enforce intended domain restrictions on content access, which allows re
CVE
CVE-2011-1244
Microsoft Internet Explorer 6, 7, and 8 does not enforce intended domain restrictions on content access, which allows re
Microsoft Internet Explorer 6, 7, and 8 does not enforce intended domain restrictions on content access, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information or conduct clickjacking attacks via a crafted web site, aka "Frame Tag Information Disclosure Vulnerability.".
MEDIUM · CVSS 5.8
EPSS 0.15136
EPSS exploitation odds15.14% · top 3%
Schedule remediation
- EPSS ≥ 0.10 - elevated exploitation probability
- EPSS percentile: top 4% of all CVEs by exploitation likelihood
Sigma rules2
YARA rules0
Look this up elsewhere - one-click external pivots
▸
How to read a CVE - triage first, then detect and patch
This page is every public fact about CVE-2011-1244, cross-linked. Its job is to answer one question fast - does this need my attention now? - and then hand you the two things you do about it. Here is how an analyst reads it.
Triage: should I act now? Four signals, and they are not interchangeable:
CVSSseverity - how bad it is IF exploited, 0-10. A high CVSS alone is not urgency; a flaw can be a perfect 10 and never actually be attacked.
EPSSprobability - a model’s estimate of the chance it is exploited in the next 30 days, 0-1. This is the “will it actually happen” signal.
CISA KEVconfirmed - it is being exploited in the wild right now. The strongest signal on the page; KEV beats any score.
Weaponisedavailability - public exploits / PoCs, and especially Metasploit modules rated Excellent / Great. Reliable, packaged exploit code means low-skill attackers can use it today.
How they combine: KEV, or a dependable Metasploit module, means patch now regardless of CVSS. High CVSS + low EPSS + no exploit is real but not an emergency - schedule it. Low CVSS but KEV-listed still gets patched now. The verdict above already weighed these for you; this is how it got there.
Then what - two workflows:
Detectwhen you cannot patch today, follow this CVE to the ATT&CK techniques it enables, then Build a SIEM detection (the green button) - author a rule, test it in Atomic, deploy it. That buys visibility while the patch waits.
PatchAffected products / packages tell you if you are exposed; Fixed versions by distribution and Vendor advisories give the exact version that closes it.
Reading order for the panels below: verdict + badges, then Public exploits / Metasploit (is it weaponised), then ATT&CK techniques + Sigma / IDS rules (can I detect it), then Affected products / packages + Fixed versions (am I exposed, what patches it), then Threat actors / IOCs (who uses it), then Scoring & timeline / references (the evidence).
▣
Severity & exploitation scoring
EPSS exploitation probability
15.14%
Top 3%odds of exploitation in the next 30 days
CVSS metric silhouette
No structured CVSS vector for this CVE. Older entries often have only a numeric base score - the metric breakdown radar requires a full
AV:_/AC:_/... vector string published by NVD.SSVC triage
No SSVC vulnrichment for this CVE. CISA's Vulnrichment program scores newer CVEs (~2024 onwards) plus selected older critical ones. Use the EPSS probability + KEV status to triage instead.
Lifecycle
- 13 Apr 2011Published to NVD
- 16 Jun 2026Last modified
Every entry is a recorded date - NVD publish/modify, CISA KEV add, public exploit disclosure. No inferred events.
Attack path
Full kill chain
◆
ATT&CK techniques
3Techniques this CVE enables. Pills with a solid outline are high confidence - named directly in ATT&CK or Nuclei, or human-curated by CTID; the rest are inferred from the weakness type using MITRE's CVE Mapping Methodology and the CWE → CAPEC chain. Broad, generic-weakness guesses are filtered out. A small N× marks a technique that N independent sources agree on.
T1036.004 · Masquerade Task or Service T1056 · Input Capture T1548.004 · Elevated Execution with Prompt
▤ Build a SIEM detection for these techniques
▤
CAPEC attack patterns
7Attack patterns this CVE enables - the bridge from weakness to ATT&CK technique.
⬡
Weakness Classification
▤
Affected Products & Versions
1microsoft internet explorerall versions
▤
Related CVEs
8CVEs linked to this one by a shared weakness (CWE) or affected product - joins on data already in the engine, with the reason shown per row. Not a guess.
CVE-2005-2407
A design error in Opera 8.01 and earlier allows user-assisted attackers to execu...
same CWE-1021
CVE-2008-2716
Unspecified vulnerability in Opera before 9.5 allows remote attackers to spoof t...
same CWE-1021
CVE-2013-5614
Mozilla Firefox before 26.0 and SeaMonkey before 2.23 do not properly consider t...
same CWE-1021
CVE-2013-6772
Splunk before 5.0.4 lacks X-Frame-Options which can allow Clickjacking
same CWE-1021
MEDIUM
CVE-2002-2435
The Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) implementation in Microsoft Internet Explorer 8...
same product
CVE-2003-1505
Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of ser...
1
same product
CVE-2003-1559
Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.22, and other 5 through 6 SP1 versions, sends Refe...
same product
CVE-2005-4840
The Outlook Express Address Book control, when using Internet Explorer 6, allows...
same product
◈
Sigma Hunt Rules
2Exact rules name this CVE ID. Product rules name an affected product in their title. Related rules cover techniques used by actors who exploited this CVE. Showing the most relevant matches; the complete related set is on the full drill-down.
🔗
References & Sources
5Source URLs (vendor pages, mailing lists, write-ups). Exploit/PoC links are in their own section above to avoid duplication.